Monday, December 26, 2016

“Real people like dogs”

Beloved Ruth

Can’t say I ever heard my beloved Aunt Ruth Eloese Anderson Dunaway put it just that way, but she did express a worry that my enduring dislike for the creatures would surely unfit me for any happiness in the life hereafter.

Esteemed Valerie (a very real person)
So I confess: when selecting fellow creatures for any sociality or proximity, I have always gravitated toward those that slobber not, neither do they yap. And when they poop, they do their best to cover it up. 










Valerie, my esteemed and cherished eternal companion, evinces saintly patience toward all my sins and disabilities, including this one. But she’s far from sharing it: like our descendants, she gets all sloppy over Rick’s and Laura’s big, floppy Rudy. Who doesn’t get it and still, now and then, invites me to throw his red ball. To do which, thank you very much, I decline.

Rudy
And now I’m informed that our very language takes part in this conspiracy against my reality. Real people, you see, because they love dogs, are properly known as cynophiles. Some unfortunates bear the cynophobe tag: they fear the beasts, whether or not they also like them. 
A figment without a category

But the dictionaries seem to possess no antonym for cynophile. If, contrary to demonstrated fact, I hated women, I’d garner opprobrium as a politically-incorrect misogynist. If, equally improbably, I hated marriage, I’d be a misogamist. Or if I hated reasoning, I’d qualify as a misologist. But at least I’d still exist. And there’s apparently no “misocynist” nor “misopooch” nor anything of the sort that would acknowledge me as a recognized (if lamented) entity.


Does the commandment to “love thy neighbour” transcend the dictionary?


Saturday, August 13, 2016

"Sociality"


My computer screen says it’s 4:42 a.m., on Friday, August 12, 2016. Normally, I’d still have a couple of hours of slumber before facing bathroom scale, toothbrush, blood sugar and pressure measurements, a cup of grapefruit juice, a fiber bar (prescribed by the colonoscopy doctor), a fistful of pills, and the general circulatory and articulatory creaking that initiate each new day. But there’s no point in trying to go back to sleep, because I’ve had some prayers answered in a bunch of connections that I have to capture here, while I remember them. 

I’ve been praying, recently, for help with a cluster of teaching opportunities: 

  •  home teaching next Sunday (assigned topic: “The Hope of Eternal Family Love”); 
  •  a lesson in High Priests’ Group, a fortnight later (“Yielding Our Hearts to God”); and
  •  a Sacrament Meeting address, some time in October (“Temple Worship”) 

Brent
So, while pondering this diffuse handful of topics yesterday, in the interstices of everyday life, I accompanied Valerie to the Bountiful Temple. A friendly ordinance worker named Cottrell noticed my name, scanned my face, and asked whether I was related to my darling baby brother, Brent. Upon enlightenment, he asked that I pass along his greetings to Brent and Mimi, explaining that he and his wife had enjoyed their company over a recent eighteen-month Temple mission in Nauvoo. A warm and brotherly exchange, very brief and suitably muted by the surroundings, but none the less sweet for that. 


Me

After our shift, I placed my very first FaceTime call. Brent and Mimi answered from their car as they headed to a family gathering. I delivered the message; they were glad to hear from the Cottrells and shared in the pleasure of the connection. We remarked upon the frequency of such serendipities in the Temple, which brought up another apparently-random encounter in Bountiful, this time with Henry B Eyring of the First Presidency, whom I’d reminded (without expecting that he’d remember; he didn’t) that I’d been his Home Teacher, briefly, when we’d been graduate student and undergrad, respectively, in Cambridge. We reminisced about the long staircase to his Sacramento Street apartment, and parted with a smile and a handshake. 

I remarked to Brent that President Eyring is still, despite his exalted calling and consequent celebrity, utterly un-stuck-up: “just Hal.” Which elicited an anecdote from Brent: President Eyring had issued a calling to an old friend and classmate (I’ll call him Steve, not recalling his name) to preside over a Temple for three years, following immediately upon his three-year service as a counselor to his predecessor. In disappointment that he wasn’t to enjoy any respite from the rigors of that assignment, he burst forth with “Hal! Don’t I get any rest?” “Steve! You ask me that question?” — referring to his own extended and unremitting sequence of highly-demanding Church offices. 

Relevance? Well, we don’t go to the Temple (nor, for that matter, to other Church gatherings) in the conscious expectation that we’ll encounter others whose fellowship, however episodic, will enrich our life experiences. But it happens. All the time. Valerie and I frequently remark to each other, while driving back to Kaysville, what a lovely bunch of people we serve with in the Temple, and what a blessing it is to rub shoulders with them. And it occurs to me that we just may find there a glimpse of what Brother Joseph was saying when he puzzled me by describing the “sociality” of the Celestial Kingdom as the same, in unspecified respects, as that we enjoy here. 

And then there’s the “sociality” that we experience with our kindred dead, whom we name in the Temple and on whom we seal magnificent blessings, always on condition of their faithfulness. The ordinances we perform keep us reminded of our debts to them as our forebears and of our continuing connections to them. And the growing pleasure and urgency we feel in seeking their eternal happiness. And the sense of reticulated connectedness and occasional communication that doesn’t seem to care about distance in time and kinship.

In this month's First Presidency Message for Home Teachers, that same President Eyring asserts, quoting an unnamed prophet, that if we "live worthy of the celestial kingdom, ... the family arrangements will be more wonderful than [we] can imagine." Our family has to receive that in the context of our hopes and faithful expectations for "sociality" with our Chris, who before his suicide emphatically rejected his Gospel birthright, but who was born in the Covenant and who is therefore sealed forever to us. We still love him and want to enrich his eternal life and ache to take hope and comfort from such insights.



Mary Beth and Chris




Sunday, January 8, 2012

2011—Senior Primary “Chorister”?

Like all nice Mormon boys, I was brought up to look upon Church callings (assignments from ecclesiastical leaders to serve in specific, responsible positions) as awfully close to Divine commandments. J Reuben Clark, the first General Authority I ever paid serious attention to, was known for describing callings as something that faithful Latter-day Saints “neither seek nor decline.” As a matter of principle, and in the abstract, that has always been my position.

Royal P. Skousen
Like some distinguished forebears, however, I must confess to receiving some official assignments “with a doubting heart” and with audible grumbling. Haven’t yet written up in these pages my experience in receiving from Boston Stake President Mitt Romney a call to serve as president of the Asian branch in Lynn; it’s instructive, but I’m not particularly proud of it.

More recently, I have just been called as Senior Primary “chorister”1 in the Fox Pointe Ward. The last time I attended a meeting of the Primary Association, I was (embarrassed to be) eleven years old, in San Bernardino. The whole program has evolved, well out of my recognition. Last Sunday, everybody was very tolerant of my clumsy incapacity, but it wasn’t much more than a classic learning experience.

Adam S. Bennion
Today went much better. Sweet little Savannah Kartchner, age 9 or so, came up afterward and said, with a sincerity I’d be a cad to gainsay, that I’d done a good job. As rivers of water in a dry place…

Levern M. Hansen
But by the time that third-hour session started, I’d requested and received an almost-chiropractic adjustment to my attitude. As the fast and testimony meeting proceeded, I was fairly suddenly aware of the faces of four men, hovering somewhere around the edges of my consciousness. I was supposed to be listening to the meeting, but I turned my mind’s eye to the faces and recognized them as belonging to Royal P. Skousen, Adam S. Bennion, Levern M. Hansen, and Paul H. Dunn—all Church leaders I had known and regarded highly, as a child, more than half a century, ago. All now deceased, but all tied into precious memories for which I feel some obligations of stewardship, even today.

Paul H. Dunn
Considering them together (and, I must confess, missing each acutely, even after all this time), I realized what they had in common: each had, at least once, treated little me as a fellow human being, worthy of respectful attention, even as older people of rank and attainments waited their turn. And suddenly, with tears, it became clear that I have now received an opportunity—perhaps my last in this world—to show gratitude to those dear brethren.



1As far as I know, only Mormons apply the term “chorister” to a song leader. To everybody else, a chorister is a member of a choir.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

1978—The Blizzard
Sunday, February 5, 1978. Supper-time at the kitchen table in Timbaloo. Speakers on the wall, feeding us the news. Hmmm. A monster storm is about to hit Washington, D.C.; it will then head up the coast toward New England. Now, we loved to make jokes about the unreliability of the Weather Service, and so we were inclined to shrug off the forecast.

EXCEPT that I had in my briefcase a multi-million-dollar Abt Associates proposal that had to be in Washington at noon the next day. Given the District’s well-known inability to function under what we’d consider trivial amounts of snow, I had the makings of a problem.

So, in typical mature, measured fashion, I left my supper half-eaten and my boots, gloves and heavy overcoat in the closet, called a cab to Logan Airport, grabbed the next Eastern Airlines shuttle out (which turned out to be the last one to land at National Airport, before the snow closed it down). Got there in the middle of Sunday night, took a motel room near National, and woke in the morning to
find the pantywaists of our nation’s capital paralyzed by a few inches of snow. Called around and found an enterprising chap on skis who took my proposal1 across the Potomac to its destination.

So now (Monday mid-morning) I was at liberty to go home. But how? The airports were closed, and even if I could get on a plane going to Boston, it wouldn’t be able to land anywhere in New England. Made my way to Union Station and learned that the Montreal Express (I think that was its name; or maybe that was what we called this kind of nor’easter) train was scheduled to leave around midnight. Bought a ticket. Finally departed after dawn on Tuesday. Before long, the train was acting as a snowplow and going VERY slowly. The meager food supplies on the crowded train ran out quickly.


1As it turned out, the agency extended the deadline. Ours was there on time. The winning proposal (not ours) met the second deadline. Hmpf.
We crossed into Massachusetts Thursday morning, stopping at Route 128, as they announced, to pick up the corpses of some motorists who had died of carbon monoxide poisoning in their immobilized cars. Arrived in Back Bay Station early Thursday afternoon, sixty hours after scheduled departure from Washington. Seven snowy miles from home. Hungry. Weary. All the vending machines in the station had been empty for days. But the phones were working! Called home from a pay phone (remember them?); assured Valerie (six months pregnant) that I was still alive, sorta, and asked her to send the three boys out to clear a path up Timbaloo’s front steps.
Then started to pay attention to the officials who were ordering us to stay put until they’d see fit to give us leave to go. Called The T and learned that a piece of the Green Line subway (ending three long blocks away) was still running as far as Park Street, and that the Red Line was still operating from Park Street to Harvard. Conspired with similarly-rebellious fellow-passengers, and ultimately set out northish along Dartmouth Street toward the Copley Station subway stop, about a quarter of a mile, through head-high snow, with an elderly academic, a blind woman, and her companion.
The snow and wind had pretty much tapered off, but Governor Mike Dukakis had ordered all roads closed except to emergency vehicles; it would be weeks before Brunnhilde could legally leave our driveway.

Must admit it was tough, slow going, and the blind girl and her friend were glad to find an old, traditional hotel (which I’ve been unable to identify since) a bit more than half-way along our route. We all went in and found the dark lobby (the power was out) crammed with fugitives like ourselves. In a true spirit of hospitality, the uniformed hotel staff circulated in the crowd, bearing candles, tea, and something like what our Brit friends call biscuits. Our blind companion was perfectly at home in the darkness; she and her friend stayed there, while the professor and I pushed on after a little rest.
Finally made it to the subway station, where we shook hands and wished each other well, and he continued toward his Back Bay home. The T carried me to Park Street and then to Harvard without further mishap (and without asking for the usual fare). Emerged to a truly startling sight: Harvard Square with no traffic, unless you count a couple of police cars and the odd snowplow.

Five miles to go. Recall, if you please, that I was wearing (really inadequate) plastic shoes, a light overcoat, no gloves, and no hat. Carrying a briefcase. Did have my sunglasses, thank the Lord. Well, the plows had moved or compacted the snow on Mass Ave, and I was all alone as I trudged up the middle of the road as far as Porter Square, where a pleasant fellow offered me a ride on his snowplow.
He dropped me off in the middle of Appleton Street, right in front of Timbaloo, bless his gizzard. Where, of course, my three faithful sons were throwing snowballs at each other in the general vicinity of the unshovelled stairs. Climbing them (the stairs, not the boys) resembled swimming more than walking, but I did arrive at last, weary, cold, and famished.
Now that we were together again, and ever since, we’ve had to confess that this historic disaster turned out, on balance, a very positive experience for us. We saw more of each other, got to know our neighbors, and enjoyed with them a we’re-in-this-together spirit that might otherwise never have arisen.

We remember our disrupted church situation, in particular, very positively: until they once again permitted parking in Cambridge, we held Sacrament meeting in our parlor for those of our neighbors who cared to participate. Our guests on these occasions included some we seldom if ever saw at the Chapel. We resumed our normal commute with mixed feelings.

Monday, April 18, 2011

A procrastinated thank-you

I've been diffident about posting this memory. It's tender, and I wouldn't wish to impose that tenderness on anybody who wouldn't be glad to harbor it. But you can just skip it, in that case. Ray Glazier says I should post it, and I value Ray's counsel. I'll watch for comments.






President Thomas S. Monson
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
50 East North Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84150

Dear President Monson,

This is by way of a belated thank-you note. In 1967, you were pivotally helpful to a man we love, and your kindness has begotten wonderful consequences about which you ought to know. Please forgive our procrastination: we’ve repressed good intentions for years.

You may perhaps remember H. Duane Anderson, who was called in 1967 to preside over the mission in Paris. The picture shows Duane and Leola, as they looked then. They’re the parents of one of us and the grandparents-in-law of the other. After decades of teaching French language and culture, our Pappy was thrilled to receive this call, but it also terrified him. As he related the story to us later, he poured out his heart to you in a private meeting, asking how hecould possibly direct the work of three hundred missionaries, when he had never himself served a mission. He told us that you comforted him, related some stories of missionaries who had done mighty work despite a lack of preparation, and assured him that the Lord would make him equal to his opportunities. He went to Paris reassured, and had an intense and honorable experience there.

Now we fast-forward to 1991 when young Ron Ralston had the good fortune to fall in love with the Andersons’ eldest granddaughter, Cynthia Lee Anderson of Arlington, Massachusetts. To his great joy, Cyndi agreed to wait for Ron while he served a mission to Milwaukee.





President Thomas S Monson                     Page 2



Full of enthusiasm, Ron entered the MTC, where it became apparent that a disability would keep him from serving a mission. He came home absolutely desolated, and he went around saying to himself and to others, “Cyndi will never marry me, with all the missionary tradition in her family. Here I tube out of the MTC! She's going to break our engagement. There is no way she's going to marry a guy who couldn't make it through the MTC.”

Our Pappy became aware of Ron’s distress. As Ron remembers it, Pappy called him in and related the story of his own misgivings at the brink of the mission field and how you had assured him that the Lord would make him equal to the challenge. Pappy then, as head of the Anderson family, welcomed Ron to the family and told him: “Nobody in this family is going to hold it against you that you didn't get to go on a full-time mission. If anybody gives you any trouble about it, you send him to me.”

Before too long, Cyndi and Ron were married in the Salt Lake Temple (it was several years too soon to make it happen in Boston). They and their children (see the fairly recent photo on the next page) are forever grateful to you for teaching our family patriarch how to strengthen the feeble knees.






President Thomas S Monson                     Page 3


So now you know; we hope you rejoice. And we do sustain you and pray for you always. Thanks for a beautiful Conference and for your blessings upon us; we treasure them. Within the limits of our capacity, we send you also our blessings.

With much love,




Ronald Ralston




Richard B. Anderson












Mr. Richard B. Anderson
390 East 1500 South
Kaysville, Utah 84037

Dear Brother Anderson:

Thank you for the letter from you and your son-in-law
Ronald Ralston regarding your dear parents, H. Duane and
Leola Seely Anderson. You have a noble heritage of devotion to
the Gospel of Jesus Christ, even in the face of sacrifice and
trials.

There was deep sadness on the passing of your mother
and great admiration for your father as he continued to serve
with faith and courage. How grateful we are for comfort and
peace received from the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the gift of
the Holy Ghost.

Please give my love to your family. May our Father in
Heaven bless you in the service you give and in all that you do.


Monday, November 15, 2010

Shakespeare Was Never…


Y’know, I really don’t feel in charge of this thing. As random as its topics may appear, it has felt as if each was imposed on me, in its due time, by apparent coincidence.

I don't believe in coincidence.

Yesterday, an e-mail announced preparations for MIT's coming sesquicentennial celebration. So how could I not begin to ruminate on my participation in the centennial, in 1961?

Then, just today, a letter surfaced in which I'd reported that very participation to Valerie, fifty years ago but only two days after the event. So here's the story. As before, I present it on compulsion.




Contrary to prevailing Harvardian calumnies, there's plenty of culture at MIT, including a great deal of the conventional sort. This story stands out in my memory, however, even in some pretty stellar cultural company.

It fell to our East Campus House Committee to bring to pass a perfectly magical cultural event that I’m going to try to describe. Not in the hope that you’ll be able to reproduce it—I’m firmly convinced that that can never be—but because I count it among the miracles that have taught me about the love of God.1

It was 1961: MIT’s Centennial Year. Everybody was remembering a hundred proud years and laboring to make memories that would last another century. Aldous Huxley and e. e. cummings were lecturing and reading in our halls of assembly and broadcasting over our airwaves2 and along the audio cables that complicated our ledge-walks.

We in East Compost cherished a long and distinctive tradition of sponsoring only the dead minimum of parties and other conventional social gatherings, in firmly-intentional contrast to the policies of the fraternities and even of other dormitories.

So, some consternation ensued when the powers that be passed along to the East Campus House Committee, via the Dormitory Council and therefore via my reluctant self, an urgent mandate to plan and bring to pass some sort of event of memorable cultural value. Also a $50 budget. More money then than now…

Given our traditions and predilections, how could we possibly cooperate to leave a coherent cultural mark on the Centennial? Our customary hacks, however subtle or sophisticated, didn’t really fit the description. Nor did hall-hockey, mega-water-fights, or any of the other ways in which we usually came together to do things. It’s not that we were without culture, but rather that our cultural preferences tended to vary widely and individualistically, to be more solitary than collaborative, and to partake of a sense of humor bordering on the sardonic.

We argued and agonized. More than one meeting bore no fruit. Until my good friend Charlie Weller, Third Floor Hall Chairman (if I recall aright), brought one of his constituents to an ad hoc “let’s try one more time” House Committee gathering. This parishioner of Charlie’s stood out for oddness in this very individualistic assembly. I’m going to call him “Lance,” inasmuch as I don’t remember his real name. Not one whose company I ever sought out. Presumably brilliant, on some level, but then that went without saying, in those Sputnik-haunted days and corridors.

While Charlie shrugged and rolled his eyes and the rest of us sat by slack-jawed, Lance made us a thunderstrikingly strange proposal. He’d relieve us of the burden of our assigned event and promise us something cultural that we’d always remember, but in return we had to buy his plan sight unseen and do it exactly his way, with no further negotiations or modifications. The budget, said Lance, was plenty. We’d also have to give him the green light to arrange a partnership with our very opposite numbers at Senior House.

Well, we debated, but not nearly as long as we’d already done to no avail. Seeing no real alternative, with tremblings, we cast our lot and our budget with Lance and invited him to reveal this non-negotiable plan of his. Before long, we convened the first (and likely only-ever) joint conclave of the East Campus/Senior House governing Committees. Where Lance laid it on us:
  1. We were now irretrievably committed to mounting a full, costumed outdoor performance of Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream in the L-shaped courtyard between Senior House and the President’s House.

  2. Much of the action was to take place in the courtyard itself, among the audience, who would occupy folding chairs. Palace scenes would mostly happen on the Senior House balconies; the President’s wall would double as Fairyland. The halls of Senior House and the President’s back yard would be our backstage.

  3. This would be a reading performance: nobody would have to memorize lines.

  4. Lance would allocate parts at random, with no right of appeal nor, one supposes, demurrer. Nobody with previous stage experience would be eligible for a speaking part.

  5. There would be no rehearsals. Lance would walk each actor individually through his entrances and exits. The cast would meet for the first time at the one and only performance.

  6. We’d borrow costumes from Dramashop. Except for the inexpensive paperback script from which each of us would read, the munificent budgets of the sponsoring organizations (us and the Senior Housers) would be combined and spent on very nice cookies and punch for audience and cast to share afterward.

A few misgiving voices rose to challenge our commitment. Had they been able to propose any concrete alternative, they might have prevailed. As it was, they subsided, and we set to work with doubting hearts to make the best of our Centennial obligation.

The randomness of Lance’s casting remains in historical doubt, but nobody then or now seems to want to point any fingers. The central rôle of Puck went to Mary, the daughter of Dean of Students John T. Rule. I’m morally certain she had prior stage experience, but she delivered a performance that I remember as treading the line between fetching and dazzling—what I could see of it, from my usual position in the “wings.” And her central position in the cast guaranteed that the prominent Rule family would attend in force.

In the same pulsating vein, three of the four named Fairies were President Jay and Kay Stratton’s daughters, Cathy, Cary, and Laurie. If it hadn’t already been a foregone conclusion that the Strattons would come to this activity in their back yard, this casting decision surely applied the stamp of certainty.

Me, I drew a genuine bit part, that of Egeus, father to Hermia. Normally listed second only to Duke Theseus in lists of dramatis personae, but granted by the Bard only two short and rather querulous scenes. My costume featured a marvelous, heavy, ankle-length wool cape, which I was just ham enough to swirl about in my sparse moments on stage.

So we collected our paperback scripts, went through our parts individually with Lance, and got costumed and made up at Dramashop. On the big night, a numerous and locally-stellar congregation did in fact assemble on the folding chairs.

I wish I could provide a coherent account of the performance. You’ll have to use your imagination, and it’ll fall short. You really had to be there. One brief example, to illustrate the difficulty. My excellent friend and fellow MIT Concert Band clarinetist Joe Goldfarb drew (again I doubt the randomness) the rôle of Moonshine in the play-within-a-play. Where (Act V, Scene 1), in his truly spectacular Brooklyn accent, he intoned:


     This lanthorn doth the horned moon present…

     Myself the man i’ the moon do seem to be…

     this thorn-bush, my thorn-bush; and this dog, my dog.


To get the full flavor of this comic climax, you have to assimilate Joe’s classic manner of speech, in which, for example, “this dog” has three syllables, resembling, sequentially, “diss” “dough,”and “ugg.”

Near the outset, I delivered my first resonant line: “Full of vexation come I, with complaint against my child, my daughter Hermia!…” Then for much of the rest of the performance, I hunkered in the President’s yard, behind its surrounding wall, in company with other bit-players. Including, as it turned out, the lovely Laurie Stratton, whom I had heretofore admired from afar but actually met only on rare, rather formal occasions.

Well, as it happened, Laurie’s somewhat skimpy fairy-costume wasn’t really adequate to the chilly evening, and she gave some visible evidence of distress, even in the moonlit gloom. Fetched up as a gentleman, what else could I have done? I invited her into the coziness of my big wool cape, and we kept each other warm in the most chaste manner imaginable, until one of us had to arise to the call of another cue.

For bashful, virginal, nineteen-year-old me, this innocent little interlude was fraught with a great deal of hormonal electricity. I don’t flatter myself that it was so for her. I don’t recall that Laurie and I ever met again.3 But I suppose that you need to know about this part of the story, if you’re to decide what to make of the rest of my account.

…For my recollections put this evening in a very sparsely-populated category: that of perfectly magical, one-off, irreproducible occasions of amazing joy. I’ve been blessed with a few such; this is the most secular of them and therefore the one I feel most free to recount here. For each, I won’t live to return enough thanks to the Source of all marvelous things.

As I recall it, the prevailing mood around the very nice fifty-dollar cookies and punch was rather breathless. Something had happened. Reminiscent of Peter on the Mount of Transfiguration, blurting out: “…it is good for us to be here…” However enhanced and distorted my personal experience may have been, it remains an objective fact that we, MIT, and Shakespeare had a huge, memorable, cultural success in the Senior House courtyard, despite all reasonable expectations.

I don’t know what ever became of “Lance.” I seem to have heard that he dropped out of MIT without graduating, but that’s as uncertain a recollection as any. It’s only now, half a century later, that it occurs to me how perfectly his achievement on our behalf fits with the classic “hacking” ethos that infused and shaped my East Campus experience: unexpected and even counterintuitive results from clever and unconventional techniques, playing fast and loose with “the rules” as required, and all executed in an atmosphere of high spirits and, sometimes, low humor.

Here’s how I reported the same event in a letter to Valerie the next Sunday, April 30:




Tech

April 30, 1961

Dearest Valérie,

...Had a big triumph-type occurrence Friday night that all but pulled this small tool out of his perennial depression. As follows:

Shakespeare orgy was held, celebrating Old Willie's birthday. We had a highly informal reading enactment of Midsummer Night's Dream, advertising of which drew us a capacity crowd of distinguished people out for a good deal of fun. Dean Rule's daughter, Mary, played Puck and really stole the show. She's 15 years old and a natural-born, freckle-faced ham. Once, she lost her place by turning one page too many and started reading some of Oberon's lines. Then, realizing that the lines were unfamiliar, she grinned, muttered, "Lord, what fools these actors be," and picked up where she should have been, bringing down the house.

I had the only straight part in the whole thing: Egeus, the villainously proud old curmudgeon whose sole function is to act as a foil for a whole playful of delightful tomfoolery. Well, I poured all that's dramatic in me into that obscure part and had the satisfaction of having the director gently berate me afterward for making the principles [sic] look sick! Yep, I'm bragging -- so there! Pres. Stratton, ex-Pres. Killian, Deans Fassett and Rule, and a couple of reporters were very flattering afterward. Just thought you might like to know that your aged boyfriend is moderately famous now -- only a week after being in the slough of despond.

The whole thing was immensely successful -- largely because there ws no expectation of an artistic production. Nobody was nervous, because we all had scripts there with us. Everybody just plain had fun, and in the process a great deal of the basic hilarity of the play came through that might not have shown in a more self-conscious production...I honestly haven't had half so much fun in a long time...




1You may well think me irredeemably silly on this score. Go ahead. I can’t help it. That’s still how it affects me, almost half a century later.

2“WTBS-AM, 640 on your dial in Cambridge, the Radio Voice of MIT.” For a while, I deejayed a twice-weekly evening “classical” music program from the studio in the basement of Senior House. Until fellow radio guy Lew Norton told me I talked through my nose. Kinda lost interest, after that.

3Laurie’s father’s extended 1994 obituary, published by MIT, lists her among his survivors as Mrs Laura Thoresby of London. I ran into Kay Stratton at an Alumni Council function in the 1990s and inquired after Laurie. Mrs Stratton replied that her daughter had divorced “her barrister” and was working as confidential secretary to a Saudi prince. Also that I shouldn’t feel lonesome for having had a crush on Laurie. Much of East Campus and Senior House seemed to have shared the experience.

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Missionary Journal
of Leola Anderson 1967-68


Friends and Companions--

The lost is found! In all our movings-around, I'd lost track of the journal that my Mammy (Leola Seely Anderson) kept during the last year of her life, while Pappy (H Duane Anderson) was mission president in Paris. It surfaced last Wednesday, and I spent an emotional day on Thursday, scanning its 115 pages and reducing them to a PDF file named "LSA Journal 1967-68.pdf"

Below, the first page of actual journal entry. The whole thing runs to 21 MB; you're welcome to download it from

http://commensa.net

Just click on "Parked Files," then on "Family Publications," and then tell it you want to download "LSA Journal 1967-68.pdf".


Back while it was missing, our daughter Cyndi expressed interest in transcribing it into machine-readable text. She's still so inclined, but she's willing to share the opportunity with others who may feel similar motivations. If that's you, please make contact with her at cyndiralston@gmail.com.